What digital wants

April 4, 2014

OLD-ISH CONTENT WARNING: You are viewing a post that’s more than three years old. There’s a good chance that a lot of the following is seriously out-of-date (or at least not reflective of my current thinking on this topic). Proceed with caution.

I’m really starting to have an issue with our usage of the word “digital” as a noun. I guess it bothers me because as soon as we use this word in this way, it becomes easier for us to generalize in ways that I don’t think are particularly helpful. We start talking about “what digital can do for you” or “how digital changes us” or whatever. It starts to feel as if “digital” is a sentient being that has its own morals, values, and desires. And I just don’t believe that that is true.

Hrm. Maybe I should occasionally highlight things that I think are wonderful, instead of just things that annoy me. ;)


If you enjoyed reading this, just imagine how much fun it would be to work with me! I am available for all manner of museum and non-profit digital engagements.

See what I can do for younavigate_next

April 3, 2014

}} So, I figured out that if I put a question mark at the end of the post title, Tumblr enables comments. So all of my posts will have awkward question marks at the end of their titles, which is probably

April 3, 2014

}} Eric Brockmeyer’s keynote has gotten me thinking a bit more about what net/digital/technology-native storytelling might look like. I don’t think we’ve yet figured out what that is. To a great extent,

April 3, 2014

}} As usual, I’m starting to have more and more of a problem with a certain word that a lot of us have started to use with increasing frequency–“storytelling.” It’s a really nice sounding word, but I don